A Consultant's View

Prairie Trail Software, Inc. ............................................................. June 2005

R o b o t s ?

The great science fiction writer, Isaac Asimov, wrote a series of novels where he coined The Three Laws of Robotics. The first law is that robots may not harm a human, and the second is that robots are to obey. (The third, to protect themselves unless it violates laws one or two, doesn’t matter to our article.)

Asimov’s robots were safe. They did not go beyond what they human masters wanted them to do. Isn’t that what you want employees to be like: safe, do not have, do whatever is told them, etc. The reality is that people are difficult.

Throughout the 60’s and 70’s, American children were taught to be creative, unstructured, unencumbered, and free. The idea was to raise people able to handle a rapidly changing world and make sense out of it; to handle all the new things that had made modern American, modern American.

Education isn’t like that any more. We are seeing more and more standardization, more and more uniforms, more and more state wide tests giving way to national standardized tests.

Businesses are pushing some of these changes so that they can get the right kind of worker – yet, do we really want robots?

Robots focus on doing their given tasks, and they do their tasks quite well. However, they are unable to be creative thinkers – kind of like the stereotypical accountant running a business. This is a well known path to losing a business because accountants get so focused on managing costs that they lose sight of the need for new products.

But, hiring and managing creative people is a lot harder than it is to hire and manage most people.

Most employees need one kind of management style, creative employees need another. Employees who think creatively need more leadership than supervision, honest respect instead of chains of authority, a “longer rope” instead of a short leash, and an acceptance of errors (and they will make errors) instead of zero tolerance.

They do not need to be told how to do everything. Rather, they need to know your dreams, goals, and motivations for what you do and where the company is headed.

Given all the difficulties with managing such people, why would anyone bring creative, critically thinking people into a corporation?

If the corporation is an old, slow changing corporation, don’t try. It will only frustrate both the managers and the new employees. However, if the corporation is to survive in a rapidly changing global environment, then such people are the ones you want.

So, which do you want for your company - Robot like, risk adverse people, or creative, critically thinking people? The former are safe, the latter are profitable.